Short-form valuation
Can create an economic basis for an amicable private arrangement, provided the reduced documentation is sufficient.
Learn more →In a separation or divorce, the property is often one of the largest assets. For a sale, a takeover or the equalisation of accrued gains, the first question is therefore often what the property is worth – and as at what date.
Within the same divorce case, a property may have to be valued as at several different valuation dates.
Under German law, the statutory matrimonial property regime of the community of accrued gains (Zugewinngemeinschaft) does not mean that all assets automatically become jointly owned during the marriage. A property may belong to one spouse alone and still be highly significant for calculating that spouse’s accrued gains.
Conversely, a property may belong to both spouses without the amount of an equalisation claim being derivable from the property value alone.
Under § 1373 of the German Civil Code (BGB), accrued gains are the amount by which a spouse’s final assets exceed his or her initial assets. If one spouse’s accrued gains exceed those of the other, § 1378 BGB generally provides for an equalisation claim of half of the difference.
Put simply: final assets − initial assets = accrued gains. The property valuation determines only the property values required; the calculation under family law is not part of the property valuation.
If a property already belonged to one spouse when the matrimonial property regime began, its value at that time generally forms part of that spouse’s initial assets. For valuing initial assets, § 1376 BGB refers to the value at that point in time.
For the property valuation, the value at the start of the matrimonial property regime and the value as at the relevant final date may therefore be needed. The difference between these property values must not simply be equated with the accrued gains under family law.
Under § 1374(2) BGB, assets that a spouse acquires after the start of the matrimonial property regime, in particular upon death or by way of gift, are generally added to the initial assets, provided the statutory requirements are met.
For a property, the value at the time of acquisition by inheritance or gift and the value as at the relevant final date may be needed. Which values are actually to be included under family law is assessed by your lawyer or the family court.
If a property was acquired during the marriage, this does not automatically mean that only one property value is needed for every question. Ownership, financing, other assets and the reason for the valuation have to be distinguished.
If the question concerns the property value within final assets, the focus is generally on the value as at the relevant date. Who receives which economic share cannot be determined simply by halving the property value.
Under § 1384 BGB, in a divorce the date on which the divorce petition becomes pending (Rechtshängigkeit) replaces the end of the matrimonial property regime for calculating the accrued gains and the amount of the equalisation claim.
This is not necessarily the same as the date on which the divorce petition is received by the court. The relevant valuation date should be specified clearly from the court documents or by the instructing lawyer.
§ 1379 BGB also provides for rights to information about assets at the time of separation. Separation, pendency of the divorce petition and divorce are therefore different points in time.
If a property was already owned many years before the divorce, or was inherited or received as a gift during the marriage, a valuation date far in the past may be relevant.
Such a valuation is not simply a backward calculation of today’s market value using a general price index. Under § 2 ImmoWertV, the general market conditions on the valuation date and the relevant condition of the property must be taken into account. Standard land values, property market data and sale prices from that time, as well as the state of construction and modernisation at that time, may be relevant for this.
Any adjustment for inflation of initial assets under family law, on the other hand, is not part of the property valuation.
For a sale today or a takeover by one spouse, the current market value may be needed. This value is not necessarily identical to the value required for the equalisation of accrued gains as at a past date.
A single property may therefore require several expert values as at different dates in the same separation or divorce case.
An expert property valuation does not decide a family law dispute. It can, however, set out transparently which property value results from the property’s characteristics and market conditions as at the specified date.
An existing valuation can also be examined as part of a plausibility review or expert statement.
If no agreement can be reached on a jointly owned property, a partition auction may also come into consideration.
Can create an economic basis for an amicable private arrangement, provided the reduced documentation is sufficient.
Learn more →When a comprehensive derivation is required, especially in contentious or court matters.
Learn more →When an existing valuation is to be traced professionally.
Learn more →At most for a first orientation as at today – not as a basis for complex accrued gains calculations or court disputes.
Learn more →Property valuation for divorce & accrued gains – services, prices & enquiry →
For family law or court matters, the relevant valuation date should, if possible, be specified clearly by the instructing lawyer or from the court documents.
My work is the expert determination or professional assessment of property values as at the specified valuation dates. The calculation of the equalisation of accrued gains, the determination of asset positions relevant under family law and any other legal assessment are not part of the property valuation and remain with lawyers or the courts.